CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL "endorses" cut numbers

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL "endorses" cut numbers
From: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 08:19:58 -0500 (CDT)
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Maybe we should use this set of cut numbers:

http://www.spynumbers.com/enigmaM8.htm

Note they use "N" for 2 and "M" for 9.  :-(

73, Zack W9SZ

On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Paul J. Piercey wrote:

>
> Although your point is valid, it is legal if it has been agreed to in
> advance that cut numbers are acceptable and the precedent seems to have been
> already set.
>
> 73 -- Paul VO1HE
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>