To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL "endorses" cut numbers |
From: | Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org> |
Date: | Wed, 6 Jun 2007 08:19:58 -0500 (CDT) |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Maybe we should use this set of cut numbers: http://www.spynumbers.com/enigmaM8.htm Note they use "N" for 2 and "M" for 9. :-( 73, Zack W9SZ On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Paul J. Piercey wrote: > > Although your point is valid, it is legal if it has been agreed to in > advance that cut numbers are acceptable and the precedent seems to have been > already set. > > 73 -- Paul VO1HE > _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] send but don't log CUT NUMBERS, kr2q |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Cut Numbers, Rex Maner |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL "endorses" cut numbers, Pete Smith |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL "endorses" cut numbers, Rex Maner |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |