To: | "CQ contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [CQ-Contest] Cut Numbers |
From: | "James Cassidy" <jimki7y@earthlink.net> |
Reply-to: | jimki7y@earthlink.net |
Date: | Tue, 29 May 2007 21:52:21 -0700 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
While it may be time saving to send cut numbers, is there any advantage if the receiving op need repeats to get it right. I think one normal transmission would be quicker than repeating. I recall a M/M operation several years ago when stations started using more cut numbers, the ops were pretty skilled and almost everyone felt it was not the fastest way to get the info across, 73 Jim Cassidy KI7Y jimki7y@earthlink.net _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Circle Jerks, Jack Brindle |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Cut numbers, DL8MBS |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Cut numbers, Marijan Miletic', S56A |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Cut Numbers, Steve Harrison |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |