To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW LCR's etc |
From: | "VE5ZX" <ve5zx@hotmail.com> |
Date: | Tue, 20 Mar 2007 08:37:07 -0600 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> I like to see how I compare to others, and the little extra analysis at > http://www.arrl.org/members-only/contests/results/2006/ss-cw/error_rates.html > really interesting. Hmmmm - this is a members only link (I fixed the typo in the link). What is the reasoning behind not making the error rates and the LCRs available to every contestant? There is no mention of this in the rules! Syl Sylvan Katz - VE5ZX Saskatoon, SK _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO?, Zack Widup |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO?, Eric Hilding |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW LCR's etc, Mark Beckwith |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW LCR's etc, Craig Cook |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |