CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Spotting AD Nauseum

To: "'CQ Contest Reflector'" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Spotting AD Nauseum
From: "Randy Thompson" <k5zd@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 13:57:26 -0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I can't say for sure, but I suspect packet would allow me to add another 10%
or more to my CQWW single op scores.  Main reason is all the easy mults that
I never find on my own because they are hiding high in the band or are on
the band that I am running on.

Using packet would be another skill to master and I am sure the same guys at
the top of single op would remain, packet or no.  However, I agree with Dave
that combining the two categories would make packet a required capability
for success.  That part kind of ruins it for me.

Randy, K5ZD 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com 
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Dave Lawley
> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2007 1:52 AM
> To: CQ Contest Reflector
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Spotting AD Nauseum
> 
> > On the other hand after watching N5TJ operate from home and win the 
> > world from NA, Im more certain than even than none of the top 
> > operators would do better with packet, since running real 
> SO2R is all 
> > about rithym, 2nd radio qso points and a complete sync between 
> > rate/mults and strategy.  Packet definitively breaks that balance.
> > 
> > Felipe
> > NP4Z
> 
> I, too, have watched N5TJ operate together with K1TO and it 
> was a highlight of my contesting career to be the on-site 
> referee when those two won WRTC in 2002.
> 
> Take any top-notch SO2R contester. Yes, rate and rhythm are 
> vital. But consider this. On the second radio, in your normal 
> rhythm, you come across someone running a pileup but not 
> signing his call. Packet assistance would allow you straight 
> away to determine whether you needed the guy or had already worked.
> 
> That's just one example but I think there are lots of ways in 
> which packet could enhance the score of even a top contester. 
> By merging assisted an unassisted categories you would take 
> away choice and force everyone who wanted to compete, to use packet.
> 
> Dave G4BUO
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>