Hey, this is supposed to be fun. Remember what fun is? You folks are
taking it way too seriously.
73, Zack W9SZ
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, K6VVA LQP HQ wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, John W5TD, wrote:
>
> > Then why not state in the rules:
> >
> > Check (the last two digits made up at random)
> >
> > It seems pretty straightforward what the check is. I
> > cannot see why some people are so resistant to
> > sending the correct thing.
>
> I cannot see why the ARRL is "so resistant" to revising the rules to read
> either:
>
> 1. "You may use any CK other than your actual first year licensed"; OR,
>
> 2. "If you use any CK other than your actual first year licensed, your log
> will be considered null and void."
>
> This is really a no brainer and all future discussions on this matter can
> be eliminated, ***IF*** the ARRL takes the requisite action to amend the
> rules and ***ENFORCE*** #2 above if that is the option they roll with.
>
> Another option, of course, is to axe CK from the exchange.
>
> 73...
>
> Rick, K6VVA
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|