To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [CQ-Contest] Cabrillo forever |
From: | "Marijan Miletic', S56A" <s56a@bit.si> |
Date: | Tue, 2 Jan 2007 14:46:10 +0100 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
W2EV: Robot authors, please seriously re-examine the way that QSO: data is parsed. Once upon a time, matematician of internet fame C response was: While ch=' ' do Read(ch); I always believed that QSO is valid if callsign AND RST report are exchanged. With present technology it would be easy to digitize AGC voltage, i.e. S meter reading. But the dumbing trends prevail... HNY & 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] cut numbers, Dennis OConnor |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] cut numbers, Steve London |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] cut numbers, Dennis OConnor |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Cabrillo forever, Jack Brindle |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |