| To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] improving pileup efficiency (was NOT ID'ing every |
| From: | Jimk8mr@aol.com |
| Date: | Mon, 25 Dec 2006 23:57:06 EST |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Another factor in deciding how often to ID is how smooth was the last qso. If it was just a quick report at 40 wpm (or the phone equivalent), one can stretch things a bit. If the other guy has corrected his callsign, twice, at 18 wpm, the running station ought to ID PDQ. 73 - Jim K8MR _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Christmas Contesting Birds, Larry Schimelpfenig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Spotting, Cedrick Johnson |
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Christmas Contesting Birds, Larry Schimelpfenig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] improving pileup efficiency (was NOT ID'ing every, Eric Hilding |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |