CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Shorter Time to Submit Log

To: "Cq-Contest Reflector" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Shorter Time to Submit Log
From: steve.root@culligan4water.com
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 03:45:37 +0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
>No one is trying to tell anybody how to contest, except to the extent you're
>taking a shot at the Top Ten.
>
>73, Ken, K6LA / VY2TT



How would you determine if I'm taking a shot at Top Ten, by my score? That 
hardly seems fair. If I fall short of Top Ten, heck if I don't make Top Twenty, 
does that mean I'm a "casual contester"? Lots of people besides the top ten 
scorers are pretty darned serious about contesting even if they don't live in a 
place that results in top scores. It smacks of elitism to have a "higher 
standard" for guys who live in the "right" places. I think the ARRL had a much 
better idea with their White Paper that discussed good operating practices for 
everybody, regardless of their score. 

Before there was Packet, did ANYONE worry about uttering the wrong words during 
a CQ and becoming "assisted?". I think "Assisted" is the bastard child of 
"Packet" and had nothing to do with overhearing the wrong conversation during a 
contest.

73 Steve K0SR 


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>