CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet Cheat (excerpt of 'I can see thedifference...')

To: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>,cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet Cheat (excerpt of 'I can see thedifference...')
From: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: k-zero-hb@earthlink.net
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 01:47:38 -0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
W3WN wrote: 

> But once extenuating circumstances have been ruled out, if you have proof
> "beyond a reasonable doubt" that the station was running SO-A and not
> unassisted, I see that you have two choices:
>
> (1)  Automatically reclassify the log, telling the operator why -- and
> cutting this break, if you choose to do so, only for a "first time
offender"
> and IF the transgressions were mild.
>
> (2)  DQ the log for this year's contest.  Further penalty:  The operator
can
> not enter the same contest in any category the next year, and this to
> include operating as an op or guest op at another station in any capacity.

I like simple answers, and the above is a simple answer.  

Second the motion.

73 es beep beep,
de Hans, K0HB





_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>