| 
W3WN wrote: 
> But once extenuating circumstances have been ruled out, if you have proof
> "beyond a reasonable doubt" that the station was running SO-A and not
> unassisted, I see that you have two choices:
>
> (1)  Automatically reclassify the log, telling the operator why -- and
> cutting this break, if you choose to do so, only for a "first time
offender"
> and IF the transgressions were mild.
>
> (2)  DQ the log for this year's contest.  Further penalty:  The operator
can
> not enter the same contest in any category the next year, and this to
> include operating as an op or guest op at another station in any capacity.
I like simple answers, and the above is a simple answer.  
Second the motion.
73 es beep beep,
de Hans, K0HB
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
 |