CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes or Duped?

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes or Duped?
From: "Blake M" <n4gi@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 22:25:50 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 6:24 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes or Duped?


>So there is even
> more of a reason to log the dupes, and absolutely no penalty in doing so.
> In most cases it's even faster to log the dupe and send TU than it is to
> send QSO B4 and maybe argue with the stubborn guy who won't go away.

If I get duped by someone who I clearly recognize as one of my fellow 
"corntesters" I usually take extra effort to tell them that I have them in 
my log at XX:XX to give them the opportunity to fix their previous mistake 
(or maybe fix mine myself).  If it's someone I don't recognize, I figure 
they're just messing around and work them again, hoping they manage to write 
it down the second (or third) time.

Perhaps this is bad of me, and hopefully this doesn't inadvertently put 
anyone in the "assisted" category.....

73,
Blake N4GI

 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>