To: | "Michael Coslo" <mjc5@psu.edu>,"CQ-Contest Reflector" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW defined "single op" |
From: | "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net> |
Reply-to: | k-zero-hb@earthlink.net |
Date: | Wed, 29 Nov 2006 01:52:35 -0000 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> > And what about say a 10 meter beacon? If that isn't DX alerting > assistance, what is? > Bartender, I'd like a double of whatever Coslo is drinking. Mmmmmmm yummmmmmmmm! That stuff is excellent. Now let me see if I can talk like him. "Anyone who answers your CQ is assisting you, therefore if you call CQ and someone answers, you must declare yourself in the assisted category." Now could I get a double of what Silver is having? Thanks! "Urrrrrrrrrrrrrrrppppppppppppp" 73 es beep beep, de Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Assisted - still trying to get it right, kr2q |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW defined "single op", Tom Osborne |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW defined "single op", Ev Tupis |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW defined "single op", Michael Coslo |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |