> ----- Original Message ----
>
>> I believe that the originally quoted posting inferred that an
>> individual sponsor needs to be consistant in the way that they
>> interpret and apply their own rules.
>
> NO, they don't have to be self consistent either! Nascar has some races
> with restrictor plates and some without. <snip>
> ---------------------------
>
> We are in agreement. Using your analogy, my point is this: with no
> published change in the rules, the adjudication of the 2006 restrictor
> plate race should be identical to the adjudication of the 2007 restrictor
> plate race.
>
NO, why should they have to be consistent year to year? Even the FCC can
change the rules without changing the rules by just issuing a new opinion
on what they mean. Race sponsors can determine that certain changes to
cars or boats are outside the rules even without specific wording about
them. This is the perogative if a contest/race/event/etc sponsor, to
change or interpret the rules however they see fit... they write the
rules, they can interpret them however they like and if you don't like how
they do it, you can choose not to play. Or you can go and start your own
contest and specify the rules however you see fit, including even
requiring the use of on-site judges or specific monitoring software to
make sure the contestants comply with your vision of the rules, and then
see if anyone wants to play.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|