To: | 'CQ Contest Reflector' <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes: Should I be penalized forgetting mylicense in 2000? |
From: | Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org> |
Date: | Thu, 9 Nov 2006 22:36:37 -0600 (CST) |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, Ron Notarius W3WN wrote: > Although numerically 00 - 06 are smaller numbers than 12, they represent the > years 2000 - 2006; 12 represents 1912 (at least for another 6 years when we > finally overlap the centuries). So 12 is still the earliest check possible, > even if it's not the lowest number possible. > > 73 > Are there any of them left? Who was the earliest licensed individual ham (not counting clubs) in SS this year? 73, Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] new 75 m privileges, Tom Frenaye |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] why Unlimited [aka Assisted]?, Kelly Taylor |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes: Should I be penalized forgetting mylicense in 2000?, Ron Notarius W3WN |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes: Should I be penalized forgetting mylicense in 2000?, Barry Merrill |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |