To: | 'José Nunes CT1BOH' <ct1boh@gmail.com>,<cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Why did the Canadians (PT5M) beat theAmericans(PW5C)in WRTC 2006? |
From: | "Barry Merrill" <barry@mxg.com> |
Reply-to: | barry@mxg.com |
Date: | Sun, 20 Aug 2006 09:10:55 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Very interesting analysis, Jose, and fairly persuasive. But I wonder if you can tell how much of that 40 meter period was S&P vs Run for the two stations? Was one spending most of their time trying to run, or able to run longer because of stronger signal, or did both have similar run rates, but better S&P performance, etc? 73 Barry, W5GN _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ft1kd vs ft1kmp, Michael Tope |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ft1kd vs ft1kmp, Art Boyars |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Why did the Canadians (PT5M) beat the Americans(PW5C)in WRTC 2006?, Jukka Klemola |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Why did the Canadians (PT5M) beat the Americans(PW5C) in WRTC 2006?, k3bu |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |