CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] W5GN ANALYSES - NON WRTC 2006 PARTICIPANTS

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>,"'WRTC 2006'" <wrtc2006@wrtc2006.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] W5GN ANALYSES - NON WRTC 2006 PARTICIPANTS
From: "Barry Merrill" <barry@mxg.com>
Reply-to: barry@mxg.com
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 21:44:35 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
K8AJS has pointed out that my analysis is incorrect, but only for stations that 
had no phone QSOs.  Those stations, which can be
identified because their QSOtotal and QSOcw values are the same (and are 
correct); they just have a spurious value printed for
QSOph.  They were correctly ranked by total QSOs.

My program and its output have been corrected and the revised report has been 
sent so they can be updated on the WRTC2006 pages.

My apology for the extra time due to my careless validation.

73

Barry, W5GN

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>