| To: | "CQ-Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SO1R vs. SO2R |
| From: | "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net> |
| Date: | Sun, 30 Jul 2006 08:51:01 -0700 |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> SO2R vs. SO1R is no different than bigger antennas. If you would like to see how this debate plays out, go to the RTTY reflector and read the archives. This exact argument went on there for a couple of weeks with the same statements. Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting in the Sunlight [was: SO1R and SO2R], Bill Turner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SO1R vs. SO2R, Bill Turner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SO1R vs. SO2R, Joe Subich, W4TV |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SO1R vs. SO2R, Bob Henderson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |