To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SO1R vs. SO2R |
From: | "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de> |
Date: | Sun, 30 Jul 2006 14:30:25 +0200 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Perhaps you will find some more differences to get you into your own class without competition, people able to keep on their seat for 48 hours for instance should have their own class ;-)) -----Original Message----- From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Bill Turner Shall we also get off the HP/LP thing? The SO/MO thing? The assisted/unassisted thing? Those operations were separated into their own classes because each one had a *significant* advantage/disadvantage over the other. One radio/two radio has a similar significant difference and should be treated the same. Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Contesting in the Sunlight [was: SO1R and SO2R], Ken Claerbout |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] IOTA Contest DX Cluster Spots, David Robbins K1TTT |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SO1R vs. SO2R, Joe Subich, W4TV |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SO1R vs. SO2R, Paul O'Kane |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |