CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] SO1R vs. SO2R

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SO1R vs. SO2R
From: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 14:30:25 +0200
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Perhaps you will find some more differences to get you into your own class
without competition, people able to keep on their seat for 48 hours for
instance should have their own class ;-))


-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Bill Turner

Shall we also get off the HP/LP thing? The SO/MO thing? The
assisted/unassisted thing?

Those operations were separated into their own classes because each
one had a *significant* advantage/disadvantage over the other.

One radio/two radio has a similar significant difference and should be
treated the same.

Bill, W6WRT

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>