To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rules for HQ stns in |
From: | "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si> |
Date: | Wed, 19 Jul 2006 10:12:39 +0200 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
DF3KV: Assume instead working 5000 DLs, 2000? more 3 and 5 point contacts during the same operating time would be of better value ;-) Germany is based in Central Europe very active zone 28 and your average points per QSO wouldn’t go much higher above the present value of 2! Your 20 m perspective is wrong. We hoped for DF3KV outcome at OI2HQ zone 18 but were left behind DA0HQ and SN0HQ on QSO numbers! 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] NS Ladder Grand Finale, Haddon/N6ZFO |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] XML for real-time score reporting, Pete Smith |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rules for HQ stns in, Peter Voelpel |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rules for HQ stns in, Peter Voelpel |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |