CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] X-land QSO Parties?

To: <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] X-land QSO Parties?
From: "John Geiger" <w5td@lcisp.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 04:11:11 -0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
ALthough the Oklahoma QSO party is growing in popularity since being revived
a couple of years ago.  Iowa doesn't even have a QSO party anymore although
they tried one in the mid 80s.

73s John W5TD (ex. NE0P)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Reisert AD1C" <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] X-land QSO Parties?


> --- "Marc Ziegler, W6ZZZ" <ziegler@accesscom.com> wrote:
>
> > So far we have NEQP (1), CQP (6), and 7QP as X-land QSO Parties.
> >
> > Will this spark interest in having:
> > 2QP, 3QP, 4QP, 5QP, 8QP, 9QP and 0QP contests?
>
> 9-land already has several successful QSO parties: IL, IN, WI.  I don't
see
> those going away.
>
> In 8-land, OH and MI are big, WV not so much.
>
> 0-land (except MN) and 5-land (except TX) are the weakest.
>
> 73 - Jim AD1C
>
>
> --
> Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863
> USA +978-251-9933, <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.us
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>