Hi Bill!
You do not loose any points for -B or -N qsos with zero point claimed qsos.
Doing the math in your report shows that you had no point penalty for your -B
and
-N W/K qsos. Everything works perfect.
As our log had many W/K QSOs (we log everything we work, including dupes) I am
at a
loss as to why our 40 meter phone QSO was in your log and not in the K3LR log.
I am
glad it did not cost you any points.
73!
Tim K3LR
Cqtestk4xs@aol.com wrote:
> OK, so I got two busted W/K (marked in CQWWSSB :
>
> ( 48 -B KY8S (1) NY8S (40) )
> (1046 -B K2AT (2) K2UT (331) K2PT (308).....)
>
> I had a total of nine -B QSOs and lost, according to the UBN report and lost
> a total of 76 QSO points. Seven of the "-B" were DX, two were US. Am I
> right in thinking that any "-B" QSOs with stateside stations cost me points.
> Was I penalized DX QSOs because I had a busted W QSO?
>
> For the not in log stuff...........I had four "-N" contacts, two of them
> with W/K stations.
>
> 429 -N WJ6T(122)
> 1035 -N K3LR(3711)
>
> >From what I can figure out I lost points on these two also, even thought
> they were zero pointers.
>
> If this is the case, it sure sucks and the process needs to be fixed. I
> worked well over 100 W/K stations in CQWWSSB in my single band 40. If I get
> a
> busted W/K bust me as many W/K contacts as you wish, if I bust a DX bust me
> DX
> contacts. However, where is the sense in penalizing me points for a zero
> pointer which is NIL or Busted?
>
>
>
> Check it out:
> k4xs
> Password: 006-324
>
> Bill K4XS
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|