QQ,
It's an issue of Q. :)
A stub made from 1-5/8 heliax will have a higher Q and
power handling than one made of RG-58/u.
Ev, W2EV
--- k7qq <k7qq@netzero.net> wrote:
> Dink
> I've never heard of this LMR400 stuff, If a stub
> is being made for HF RG
> 213 is more than adiquate.
>
> After all it is a Stub to absorbe harmonics, even
> lossy old RG 11 should
> work, Just use ur handy dandy 259b to tune it.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <mwdink@eskimo.com>
> To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 20:48
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Which would make better stubs?
>
>
> > RG213 or LMR400?
> >
> > I thought LMR 400 but the data in George W2VJN's
> > Station Interference book would seem to indicate
> otherwise.
> >
> > RG213 would be cheaper. Anybody else had
> experience
> > with stubs made of LMR400?
> >
> > 73
> > dink
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> >
>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.12.8/161 -
> Release Date: 11/3/2005
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
__________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|