To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] WW SSB - the corruptive influence of packet |
From: | K3BU@aol.com |
Date: | Fri, 4 Nov 2005 16:44:27 EST |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
In a message dated 11/4/2005 7:41:30 AM Eastern Standard Time, Shadow12TFS@wmconnect.com writes: >>I think we should try having packet available to ALL catagories. It's just another contesting tool, after all. << NOT!!! It is assistance by ANOTHER operator(s)!!! Is it so hard to understand? Big difference you assembling the quipment, technology vs. getting someone else feeding the stuff to you via whatever!!!! Helllloooooo!!!! Yurim K3BU.us _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Which would make better stubs?, mwdink |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] 2005 CQWW SSB - USA 3830 Claimed Scores 04Nov2005, mwdink |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] WW SSB - the corruptive influence of packet, Radiosporting Fan |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] WW SSB - the corruptive influence of packet, Federico J. Baldi |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |