CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB. Mathematics

To: "Nodir M. Tursoon-Zadeh" <nmt@at-communication.com>,<cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB. Mathematics
From: "Mark Steven Williams" <k9gx@n4gn.com>
Reply-to: Mark Steven Williams <K9GX@N4GN.COM>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 03:24:49 +0100
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Nodir,

Obviously I haven't seen the UBN reports but I'm going to guess the 
difference is due to busted calls/reports/deductions, etc, etc.

Fortunately beyond just making the Qs one must copy and log calls and 
exchanges correctly.

73,

MSW

Mark S. Williams
K9GX
Elizabeth, IN
k9gx@n4gn.com

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Nodir M. Tursoon-Zadeh" <nmt@at-communication.com>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2005 6:49 PM
Subject: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB. Mathematics


> Hello everyone,
>
> I am very curious how final results in CQ WW SSB were calculated.
>
> Jim CN2R and Al D4B showed incredible results. My congratulations for both
> of them!
>
> But what I see from results
>
> CN2R  8655   172   668   20,938,680
> D4B     8799  172   674   20,433,438
>
> D4B has more QSO's, more MULTS. Results is less than CN2R for about 500K.
>
> They are both in Africa and it is hard to presume that D4B worked much 
> more
> other 1-point Africans. I know that Al worked 174 stations from AF and Jim
> about 50 less.
>
> I can't see where my mistake could be in my calculations. Any ideas?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Nodir Tursoon-Zadeh, EY8MM
> http://www.qsl.net/ey8mm
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>