CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W.

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W.
From: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:17:19 EDT
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
 
In a message dated 7/24/2005 9:09:31 P.M. Central Standard Time,  
dezrat1242@ispwest.com writes:

The  important point of all this is that we are missing QSLs from stations 
who  took one look at LoTW and gave up because it is unnecessarily  
complex. 


Well, Bill, if someone gives up because it is "too complex", welll, I guess  
it may be the same folks who think its a PITA to use the ARRL outgoing buro,  
just my opinion..
73-Chuck KI9A
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>