CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesters on CW (was: FCC on CW)

To: David Robbins K1TTT <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesters on CW (was: FCC on CW)
From: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 23:00:22 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Jul 22, 2005, at 6:27 AM, David Robbins K1TTT wrote:

> How about this...  If the fcc drops the cw requirement I think  
> contesting
> will be one of the few reasons for anyone to bother to learn cw.

There are three good reasons today for someone to learn CW, besides  
the licensing requirements that the FCC has slated for the chopping  
block:

* Contesting - gives you that many more opportunities to enjoy  
contesting.
* QRP & Homebrew - simplest rigs are all CW.
* It's fun!

> Its not
> like many hams build their own very simple cw radios today so have  
> to learn
> it to get on the air at all.

It is true in the QRP community. Lots of building still going on in  
that crowd.

> Nor can it be said to get through when nothing
> else can with the very weak signal digital modes available.  So how  
> can
> contesters help keep this mode alive?  Or should we keep it alive?   
> Is it
> time to drop cw contesting in favor of more digital modes?

Digital contesting is really different from CW contesting.

So long as CW remains fun, it will never go away.

Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL        Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net
Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!"
             -- Wilbur Wright, 1901

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>