it´s very easy
D4B have more BAD QSO´s
73 de oe1ems
braco
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nodir M. Tursoon-Zadeh" <nmt@at-communication.com>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2005 7:49 PM
Subject: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB. Mathematics
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am very curious how final results in CQ WW SSB were calculated.
>
> Jim CN2R and Al D4B showed incredible results. My congratulations for both
> of them!
>
> But what I see from results
>
> CN2R 8655 172 668 20,938,680
> D4B 8799 172 674 20,433,438
>
> D4B has more QSO's, more MULTS. Results is less than CN2R for about 500K.
>
> They are both in Africa and it is hard to presume that D4B worked much
> more
> other 1-point Africans. I know that Al worked 174 stations from AF and Jim
> about 50 less.
>
> I can't see where my mistake could be in my calculations. Any ideas?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Nodir Tursoon-Zadeh, EY8MM
> http://www.qsl.net/ey8mm
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|