CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Rules and the District of Columbia

To: "'Kenneth E. Harker'" <kenharker@kenharker.com>,"'N7MAL'" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Rules and the District of Columbia
From: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 23:50:09 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Ken, 

> Let's take a look at some of the HF contests that use state/section 
> multipliers:
> 
> ARRL 10 Meter Contest:         DC is its own multiplier
> ARRL RTTY Roundup              DC is its own multiplier
> ARRL International DX Contest: DC is its own multiplier
> CQ World Wide 160 Contest:     DC is its own multiplier
> ARRL 160 Meter Contest:        DC is considered part of the 
>                                MDC multiplier
> ARRL November Sweepstakes:     DC is considered part of the 
>                                MDC multiplier
> NCJ North American QSO Party:  DC is considered part of the 
>                                MDC multiplier
> NCJ North American Sprint:     DC status unclear
> CQ World Wide RTTY:            DC status unclear
> 
> The idea that adding DC as a multiplier to one contest would somehow 
> force it to be added as a multiplier in every other contest is just silly.
> DC is already its own multiplier in four very popular HF competitions.

CQ World Wide RTTY:               DC is considered part of MD 

Again, if DC is a multiplier every Indian reservation, national park, 
monument and federal facility should be a separate multiplier.  They 
certainly have the same "status."  This applies to ALL contests.  

Making DC a separate multiplier for the sake of another multiplier 
or to appeal to a small group of participants just doesn't add up. 

73, 

   ... Joe, K4IK 
 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>