Skipped...
>We still are no closer to understanding the problem with the Cabrillo
>specification for IARU & WRTC 2006 - though IMHO we would be much
>better off with addressing this bigger issue. As an example, the
>specification contains the words "proposal" & is at version 2.0 - yet my
>logging program seems to think it generates version 2.3... so it appears
>versions of the specification >2.0 are a secret. How is the participant to
>comply & in case of conflict, what to do?
Skipped...
>73, VR2BrettGraham
I wonder if some of you know about Cabrillo V3. It has been there on the
site for more then one year now but there are no links to this page from
anywhere. Therefore it is impossible to find.
Here it is http://www.kkn.net/~trey/cabrillo_v3/
As you see it is still in "Proposed" state. It has been like that since Feb
2004 and I was hoping for it to be implemented for this year RDXC but it did
not happen. I just wonder who has the power to turn "Proposed" into
"Accepted"? If this person is Trey then can somebody get in touch with him
please He is next to impossible to reach for me.
73, Igor UA9CDC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|