To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: [CQ-Contest] Voice Automation Enhancements and the future |
From: | Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com> |
Date: | Fri, 28 Jan 2005 19:44:11 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Mike, WV2ZOW wrote: > So Eric is developing full voice automation. I am only one of several folks whacking away at chunks of the "opportunity" pie :-) > What then would be the difference between operating a phone contest vs. a CW contest? > Only the ability to copy CW. Not entirely, IMHO. Phone rates per hour are much higher than CW rates, and it will take a number of "customized" operational short messages that can be triggered real fast to maximize the rates. But if a person can learn CW, and learn to type on a keyboard, then learning how to operate several banks of push buttons to do serious voice-automation can also be learned. Just as some folks still practice CW with the paddles, serious voice-automation contestors will have to do some practicing with their keys (in this case, banks of buttons). But that's where color-coding and segmenting button placements become critical more maximum efficiency. I'm only a v1.0 of what will probably take re-arranging & re-arranging to v7.0 before things work well. HA! Learning how to effectively use a 35 or 40 button "New Generation Voice-Keyer" can probably be likened to learning how to play a musical instrument !!! Certainly very similar to using a typewrite. > Next step is voice recognition/CW recognition. If > the computer does the copying, then there would really be no difference > between a phone or CW (or for that matter, digital mode or digitized > voice)contest. Any thoughts? HA! Considering the difficulty already experienced in a DX contest with dialects, speech patterns, etc. (throw a heavy dose of QSB on top), I think this is a longggggg way off into the future. QRM problems with SSB vs. CW add to the complexity of any type of incoming speech recognition/conversion. Have you tried a 250Hz filter lately on a heavily QRM'd DX station with Arctic flutter and very broken English? :-) Depending upon your ERP, SSB contesting can also require some different approaches than CW. Getting the Robot-sound minimized with SSB voice-automation is the biggest challenge. Another difficulty in voice-synthesized delivery is that I don't think certain "energy/inflection", etc. will have the same punch. W1VE and I are swapping emails and bouncing around some ideas around. I find it all pretty exciting and am so glad Gerry is hacking away at this stuff too. 73... Rick, K6VVA
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] N3OC 2-radio switch box, Peter & Judy Grillo |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Voice Automation Enhancements and the future, Jim Smith |
Previous by Thread: | [ct-user] Creating Bootable DOS CD's under Windows XP - without DOS, kd4d |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Voice Automation Enhancements and the future, Tom Osborne |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |