CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Fw: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10m prediction

To: CQ-Contest@contesting.com
Subject: Fw: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10m prediction
From: "k7qq@netzero.com" <k7qq@netzero.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 14:56:06 GMT
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Quack Note
True to a point, Don't worry about the mult if you got his info correct and he 
didn't get yours.  You get the mult, he not only looses the mult but a busted Q 
as well.
Have fun guys,  WISH I could be on for the frey.

Quack


---------- Forwarded Message ----------
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 07:55, asciibaron@comcast.net wrote:
> because so many stations do not verify the call or exchange info before 
> moving to the next station in an effort to keep their rates high.  what the 
> heck is the point of exchanging info if you are not taking care to copy the 
> exchange or callsign correctly.  several of these are the only qso i had with 
> that mult and i am certain that my qso will not count and now my score will 
> suffer.

Unfortunately true.  Based on the list of spots of W9WI found on DX
Summit after the contest, at least one spotter made a rash assumption
about my QTH.  He'll lose the QSO, and so will anyone else who followed
that spot & didn't bother to listen to the exchange...
-- 
Doug Smith W9WI
Pleasant View (Nashville), TN  EM66
http://www.w9wi.com

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>