Quack
ARRL isn't in the least interested about sharing with eQSL or any other
organization their LOTW program, They only have one agenda and it has a
big ( $ ) sign.
Rex
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Turner" <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
To: "Pete Smith" <n4zr@contesting.com>
Cc: <CQ-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 9:45 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Stimulating Participation was: Limited
AntennaHeight Category
> On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 12:34:44 -0500, Pete Smith wrote:
>
> >I acknowledge that ARRL would be "letting down their guard" to some
extent
> >if they allowed block transfers of matched CQWW QSOs, but at some point
in
> >any such exercise I think you have to ask how much you are giving away
for
> >the last 1 percent of security.
>
> _________________________________________________________
>
> The last time I checked, the ARRL would not accept QSLs from eQSL,
> even though the QSO was confirmed at both ends. They might change
> their attitude if there were some good security guarantees but it
> would be difficult to convince them. They have spent a lot of time
> getting LoTW secure and I doubt they would be willing to compromise it
> even a little bit. Just a guess, I could be wrong.
>
> --
> Bill W6WRT
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.4.2 - Release Date: 11/24/2004
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|