To: | "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>, "on4ww" <on4ww@pandora.be> |
---|---|
Subject: | [CQ-Contest] Re: Topband: 2004 ARRL 160M Contest |
From: | "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com> |
Reply-to: | Tom Rauch <w8ji@contesting.com> |
Date: | Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:01:52 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
I certainly agree with this Mark! The ARRL 160 is more of a domestic sweepstakes contest. 73, Tom W8JI > My point is that year after year the arrl160m contest has been a non-event > for me, although I was every year chasing 'new ones'. The problem is there > is not enough incentive for NA to work DX, even though the DX is a > multiplier. Meaning that most people with Beverages are not listening to > e.g. EU. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Factors Affecting Scoring], dt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again, Richard Zalewski |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Factors Affecting Scoring], dt |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again, Richard Zalewski |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |