To: | Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] The Next BIG Step in contesting |
From: | Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net> |
Date: | Fri, 19 Nov 2004 20:22:37 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On Nov 19, 2004, at 8:33 AM, Pete Smith wrote: I'm hesitant. So much of being a successful contester is knowing when to go get the hard double mult on 40, or when to put which radio on which band, etc. Do we really want to make that all transparent to all competitors? It would be a little like allowing the other team into your huddle. Depends on the granularity of the scoring and how much detail is provided. It's quite possible to do the scoring infrequently enough and summarized enough to conceal crucial operating information. I know from operating at NQ4I that some of the M/Ms either call or e-mail each other with scoring information during the course of the contest. And there are tales of the late W4AN conversing with other contestors in instant messaging while contesting. If nothing else, it sounds like fun, and isn't that what contesting is all about? Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!" -- Wilbur Wright, 1901 _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] The Next BIG Step in contesting, VE5ZX |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] The Next BIG Step in contesting, Ward Silver |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [CQ-Contest] The Next BIG Step in contesting, Pete Smith |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] The Next BIG Step in contesting, Pete Smith |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |