To: | "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet statistics |
From: | Maurizio Panicara <i4jmy.mauri@gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | Maurizio Panicara <i4jmy.mauri@gmail.com> |
Date: | Fri, 12 Nov 2004 10:22:15 +0100 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> I am afraid that the same kind of "smart" thinking applies on excesive > power! Power is another issue and deserves another thread. Technically, any ERP can be obtained with almost any input power level, and no one can verify remotely, the only plain field occurs in WRTC. Packet problem instead, assisted/unassisted, can be easily overcomed updating to actual days and merging the categories in a single one. Sometimes, hypocrisy is enforced or engaged by stupid rules. 73, Mauri I4JMY _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 10-4?, Tim Makins, EI8IC |
---|---|
Next by Date: | FW: Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet Cheerleaders, kd4d |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet statistics, Marijan Miletic, S56A |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet statistics, Yuri VE3DZ |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |