CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] RE: [WriteLog] correct scoring

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] RE: [WriteLog] correct scoring
From: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 20:31:07 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 at 14:29:50 -0000 , K9JY said:


It's scoring correctly; I noticed the same thing two years ago. They count call areas in the US and other places as a 'country.' One of the reasons I'm signing, at the suggestion of the rules, K9JY/7...

I don't think that is quite correct. According to the rules, call areas in the US (and Canada, Australia and Japan) do indeed count as separate multipliers, but not as separate countries for points-per-QSO purposes. Note also that the first contact with a station in one of these four countries counts for two multipliers, one for the country and one for the call area. So, call areas are not counted as separate countries, they are just additional multipliers. At least, that is how I read the rules at the SARTG web site (http://www.sartg.com/contest/wwrules.htm) - they look pretty clear to me (and to the authors of the contest software I am using).


You are quite correct about the /7 - according to the SARTG rules, stations in call areas other than those given in their call ID "must" use a '/x' suffix - this rule is broken more often than it is obeyed, in this and several other RTTY contests (although in some others it is only a suggestion, in this one it is a "must").

73,
Rich VE3IAY


_______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [CQ-Contest] RE: [WriteLog] correct scoring, Richard Ferch <=