To: | Cqtestk4xs@aol.com, cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet (was: self spotting) |
From: | Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com> |
Date: | Fri, 02 Apr 2004 07:11:06 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
At 08:23 PM 4/1/04, Cqtestk4xs@aol.com wrote:
But, let's take a look at the "broadcast CQ". What is really wrong with it? Bill makes a good point. Recently, I opped at a big multi for the first time, during the ARRL DX CW test. On Sunday, it appeared that 10 meters was open, at least to southern Europe, but very few stations were there. I made a point of spotting everything I worked S&P, in the hope that the world-wide propagation of Internet spots would cause people to realize that the band was open. To the extent that spots provide a profile of what's happening on a given band, they can actually be a sort of "second order beacon." That said, I personally prefer to operate unassisted as a single op, and use my second radio to check for band openings. 73, Pete N4ZR The World HF Contest Station Database will be back soon -- watch this space --------------------------------------------------------------- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland! THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS! http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/ --------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Self Spotting, K3BU |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Running vs SP (Was Self Spotting), Barry N1EU |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Self Spotting, Cqtestk4xs |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Self Spotting, K3BU |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |