To: | K1ZM@aol.com, CQ-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Response to K5ZD's Comments |
From: | Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com> |
Date: | Mon, 15 Mar 2004 08:36:33 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
At 05:26 AM 3/15/04, K1ZM@aol.com wrote:
There has been some discussion here about possibly reducing the time in 48 Of course, there's no reason why a 24-hour category would have to REPLACE the 48-hour contest. To me, it would be no different than having a single-band category -- perhaps an inducement to enter the contest for someone who otherwise would not, or for those who now only operate a few hours to go for the "full" 24. The 48-hour, all-band, assisted and unassisted categories would still be there for the Iron Man contingent. 73, Pete N4ZR 2671 calls now in the World HF Contest Station Database at www.pvrc.org/wcsd/wcsdsearch.htm --------------------------------------------------------------- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland! THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS! http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/ --------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Dates for Octover test?, K3BU |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Re: Response to K5ZD's Comments, Richard J. Norton |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Response to K5ZD's Comments, K1ZM |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Re: Response to K5ZD's Comments, Richard J. Norton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |