CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [CQ-Contest] 67 spots

To: kharker@cs.utexas.edu, cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] 67 spots
From: "AB2E Darrell" <ab2e@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 00:09:39 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Greetings Ken and the group,
I recall seeing a number of spots which include a note for the op's club, especially if it's a dxpedition. This seems to occur frequently, so is it bad, I'm not sure...it seems like it's happening frequently therefore no real advantage whether a dxpedition gets called out 275 or 300 times during the weekend. I don't know if the large number of spots is out of line for 1 station to be called out. I would say it depends on how many other stations got called out by the same op. If I am S&Ping, I call out EVERYTHING I hear up or down the band. This helps the guys who like the work all the Qs up and down the band. While doing this, I will probably hear the Dxpedition multis more frequently than I would a single op calling CQ on 1 band, so I would think it's natural for a multi to be called out let's say 6 times as frequently as an ordinary station, since the station is potentially on 6 bands at once.


I don't think excessive callouts, per se, are harmful so long as the op is also calling out everything else they hear, then it is just part of the nature of the contest packet system. I think what is a worse offense are the several ops caught by K1TTT and other node operators who apparently log in under ficticious callsigns and proceed to call out their friend 100s of times during the contest, using a fake IP address and the sort, and are not contributing to any other spot callouts during the contest except their friend. The latter clearly crosses the line on the rules, while the former makes it a lot harder to establish a line I think.

Just my two cents,
73 Darrell AB2E


From: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kharker@cs.utexas.edu>
To: CQ Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] 67 spots
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:49:45 -0600

     What, exactly, compels a station to spot a contest DXpedition 67
times in 48 hours?  What should I conclude about the fact that six out
of seven of the contest DXpedition operators are members of the same
contest club as the spotter?  A club that was named in some of the
spotter's comments?

     Doesn't this cross some line in terms of assistance?  At what point
do we begin to look at the club spotting team back in the states as an
integral part of the contest operation?  Doesn't this look a little
like the club spotting team back home was calling CQ (over the spotting
network) on behalf of the contest DXpedition?

--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kenneth E. Harker "Vox Clamantis in Deserto" kharker@cs.utexas.edu



_________________________________________________________________
Click, drag and drop. My MSN is the simple way to design your homepage. http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200364ave/direct/01/


---------------------------------------------------------------
   The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
      http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
---------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>