CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] Re: Improper Spotting

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Re: Improper Spotting
From: sawyered@earthlink.net
Reply-to: sawyered@earthlink.net
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 20:47:35 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
If all the guys chiming in about spots were spending the time doing antenna 
work or studying propagation charts, maybe they would be have better scores.  
Come on guys, lets get back to radio, antennas, etc.  The constant focus on 
computer spotting is not what the hobby is about.  Its about communicating by 
radio.

As far as I'm concerned, the more spots the merrier.  As I troll the bands 
unassisted, I mark the freqs with packet pile-ups and come back in 10 mins and 
almost always work'm first call.  

If you see someone you know, spot them.  Club menber? fine.  Someone you just 
admire as a contester? fine.  Rare DX? fine (although I never understood this, 
why give competition the juicy mult?).  At some point soon, doesn't the band 
map created by spots end up resembling the tuning dial on the radio and it 
doesn't matter how many more friends spot friends?

Lets Play Radio, not computer.  Okay?

Ed  N1UR
---------------------------------------------------------------
    The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
       http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
---------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [CQ-Contest] Re: Improper Spotting, sawyered <=