To: | John Laney <k4bai@worldnet.att.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] W2SC's ARRL DX LCR feedback |
From: | Rick Tavan <tavan@tibco.com> |
Date: | Wed, 17 Sep 2003 22:08:09 -0700 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
That's right, John - To maximize score, you operate to the standards of
the log checking program, not the published rules. Those who write log
checking software do the best they can to make it jive with the rules,
but some deviation is inevitable. I try to observe the constraints of
both the rules and the log checking software. I comb logs after the
contest looking for confusing stuff like KH6's in Delaware. If the log
checking software doesn't get smarter fast enough, it will just
encourage smart programmers to write better log combing software. I'll buy. Of course, some people think log combing is unethical. I disagree. A contest is more than a copying exercise. The inevitable weaknesses of log checking software send a clear message that meeting log checking criteria is more important than copying verbatim. And that is not a bad thing, just a feature of the playing field on which we compete. /Rick John Laney wrote: If I understand correctly, the CQ Contest Committee has real people who look at what the computer has done and think about it and don't allow disqualification of QSOs that are correctly logged. But, the ARRL is interested in having it all done automatically. So, it must be accepted as the computer spits it out. No real person has looked at the results or thought about whether a particular QSO or group of QSOs should be discarded. --------------------------------------------------------------- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland! THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS! http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/ --------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] CW Sprint Results now online, Tree |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] W2SC's ARRL DX LCR feedback, mike l dormann |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] W2SC's ARRL DX LCR feedback, John Laney |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] W2SC's ARRL DX LCR feedback, Jim Reisert AD1C |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |