Reading the many threads on this I was compelled to reply. I would like
to thank all those that have replied to my QSL request. Although being
licensed for over 30 years it has only been the last 3 years that I have
been into the DX and contesting. I am STILL trying to get my 5BWAS
confirmed and increasing my DXCC totals. I must say that I have had
pretty good luck getting the DX cards, the stateside cards seem to take
much more effort as I have had to send several cards to different
individuals in the same state before I get it confirmed. I appreciate it
when they do return my card which ALWAYS has either GS's or SASE. So
just remember, not all of use have been around for many years and have a
pile of cards in box. We are still looking for those new bands/modes.
73
Rich KJ6RA
-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
cq-contest-request@contesting.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 5:39 AM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 8, Issue 12
Send CQ-Contest mailing list submissions to
cq-contest@contesting.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
cq-contest-request@contesting.com
You can reach the person managing the list at
cq-contest-owner@contesting.com
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of CQ-Contest digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Hazards of towers and other items
2. Re: If You Don't QSL, LISTEN UP!
3. RE: If You Don't QSL, LISTEN UP! (K9YO-Cedrick Johnson)
4. Re: If You Don't QSL, LISTEN UP! (Jim Reisert AD1C)
5. RE: Etymotic versus Bose Headphones (Eric Scace K3NA)
6. Off-Time Strategy in WAE from Maryland (Mark Bailey)
7. Re: If You Don't QSL, LISTEN UP! (Charles W. Shaw)
8. Re: If You Don't QSL, LISTEN UP! (yt3t)
9. Re: If You Don't QSL, LISTEN UP! (Jan Erik Holm)
10. RE: If You Don't QSL, LISTEN UP!
11. RE: QSLing (Ragnar Otterstad)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: paule@sfu.ca
To: smidtca@sprint.ca
Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Re: Hazards of towers and other items
Message-ID: <200308052124.h75LOwhD007566@rm-rstar.sfu.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
Precedence: list
Reply-To: paule@sfu.ca
Message: 1
Try
Here is the original version:
http://www-cs-students.stanford.edu/~dufour/HUMOR/EIT.html
http://www.darwinawards.com/legends/legends1998-08.html
Here is the ham version:
http://lists.contesting.com/_towertalk/1997-July/006860.html
cheers, Paul - VA7NT ex VE7CQK - email: paule@sfu.ca
"Those who hear not the music. . . think the dancers mad."
------------------------------
From: kr7x@comcast.net
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] If You Don't QSL, LISTEN UP!
Message-ID: <200308060059.h760xOgq030630@contesting.com>
Precedence: list
Message: 2
Jim and list:
I think as a contest operation you have an obligation to at least answer
the
requests that are direct and via bureau.
As an operator at, and the QSL Manager for the IH9P operations since
1998, I
have had the same experience as Jim and the crew at KC1XX.
Fortunately this year JA3USA got Yaesu to print up 25,000 cards for the
2002
CQWW SSB operation and eveyone in the log was Q'd via the bureau for
2002
contacts. This is not quite the full undertaking that KC1XX attempted
and I
applaud their effort.
Most casual operators both US and DX work stations for the contact and
the card. IH9P feels it has an obilgation to QSL all who ask for a card.
It keeps them
comming back the next year.
I qsl direct SASE's within 2 weeks of receipt. Directs without SASE are
Q'd via
the bureau along with the bureau cards, usually every 3 months. US cards
direct
with SASE see above; all other US cards (direct no SASE and via the
bureau, yes
I get many every month) are dead filed. If you are in the US and need a
IH9P
card (SSB operations only) send direct with a SASE and you will get a
card.
This is a hobby and we all have other pressing matters, but to keep the
pool of
available contacts in contests we need to extend the effort to fill the
requests for QSL cards.
P.S. I put the 2002 log on the ARRL LOTW
73
Hank / KR7X
IH9P Pantelleria Contest Team
Tikirriki Contest Club
As the
> AD1C perspective:
------------------------------
From: "K9YO-Cedrick Johnson" <k9yo@cedrick.net>
To: "'Zack Widup'" <w9sz@prairienet.org>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] If You Don't QSL, LISTEN UP!
Message-ID: <000f01c35bad$b7c61df0$6d00010a@newcastlelimited.com>
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.GSO.4.10.10308050845160.10945-100000@bluestem.prairienet.org>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: list
Message: 3
Which is why I rarely get on the radio anymore. No time to contest, no
time to QSL!
-yo
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Zack Widup
> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 8:48 AM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] If You Don't QSL, LISTEN UP!
>
>
> On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, K9YO-Cedrick Johnson wrote:
>
> >
> > Most people have lives. They have work. They have a wife and kids.
> > They have to fix their houses, etc. There are PLENTY of
> other things
> > to do BESIDES radio. If it came to the point where I
> couldn't QSL for
> > 3 months because I had too many family commitments, I'd do
> the family.
> > Radio falls to the bottom of my priority list.
>
> Playing "devil's advocate" here, does the same rule above
> apply when it becomes contest time?
>
> 73, Zack W9SZ
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
> THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
> http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/c> q-contest
>
------------------------------
From: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
To: <ku8e@bellsouth.net>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] If You Don't QSL, LISTEN UP!
Message-ID: <6.0.0.14.2.20030805204837.02269ed8@mail.comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <20030805163124.MISE4876.imf18aec.mail.bellsouth.net@mail.b
ellsouth.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: list
Message: 4
At 12:31 PM 8/5/2003, Jeff KU8E wrote:
>I think it's pretty childish to purposely ignore someone in a contest
>just because they didn't return your QSL.
Hi Jeff,
IMO....
While it may be childish, you can't control the other station's
behavior,
only your own.
For at least a couple of years, 9Y4VU would not work KC1XX in a DX
contest. We knew he was hearing us (when someone is S9 and no one else
is
calling...). We have no idea what WE did, but I'm sure it had nothing
to
do with QSLing. Notice I said WE, we did not blame the operator, only
ourselves. The situation magically righted itself. To this day, we can
only
speculate.
The guy who sends a QSL card and gets stiffed did NOTHING wrong. The
only
power he has is to deny that person a QSO in the future. You will not be
able to MAKE him work you, but by returning QSLs, you eliminate one of
the
barriers.
73 - Jim AD1C
--
Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863
USA +978-251-9933, <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.com
PGP Fingerprint: D8E2 3D78 339F A7F1 8C13 1193 B5D1 4FB6 79D1 70DC
------------------------------
From: "Eric Scace K3NA" <eric@k3na.org>
To: "Bill Tippett" <btippett@alum.mit.edu>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] Etymotic versus Bose Headphones
Message-ID: <NEBBJKPCLKFDODKNIPHKGEHFIDAA.eric@k3na.org>
In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.0.20030805093041.026e3900@pop.vnet.net>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Reply-To: eric@k3na.org
Message: 5
My experience with in-ear headphones is:
#1: No significant isolation from room noise. If you have anything
else going on in the room (fan or blower noise from amplifier
or computer, other operators in a multi-op), your brain is going to have
to work harder to overcome both room QRM and radio QRM.
Noise processors in the headphones will help reduce fan or blower
noise but do nothing to quiet down the operator next to you.
#2: Ear buds get very uncomfortable after a few hours of continuous
use. The ear canal gets very irritated.
Personally, I am reluctant to introduce additional audio processing
after the radio before the ear.
-- Eric K3NA
-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Bill Tippett
Sent: 2003 August 5 Tuesday 09:56
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Etymotic versus Bose Headphones
Has anyone compared the Etymotic ER-4
or ER-6 to Bose QuietComfort headphones? The
ER-4 claims 20-25 dB isolation and ER-6 15-20 dB
versus ~10 dB for the Bose (if my memory is correct).
http://www.etymotic.com/
How about the comfort factor of using in-ear
earphones versus the Bose headphones for extended
periods of time?
Bose QC can be had for ~$150 used on eBay
(probably because they dropped the list price to $249
when the QC2 was introduced). I've seen the Etymotic
ER-6 for $115 new and the ER-4 for $220 new. Seems
like the ER-6 is the better value with similar audio
response curves at frequencies <3 kHz, and only
slightly less isolation (~5 dB).
Just curious if anyone has actually used either
Etymotic for extended periods of time and what you
think of them?
73, Bill W4ZV
---------------------------------------------------------------
The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
---------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
------------------------------
From: "Mark Bailey" <kd4d@comcast.net>
To: <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Off-Time Strategy in WAE from Maryland
Message-ID: <024a01c35bb7$86efa160$9601a8c0@Mark1>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Message: 6
Hello all:
I'm doing WAE CW this year from Maryland instead of the Caribbean. :-(
What do y'all think about strategy for the off times? (WAE requires 12
hours off during the 48 hour contest. You can take one, two or three
breaks. Each break must be at least an hour). A multiplier on 80 is
"4" points, "3" on 40 and "2" on 20-15-10.
I'm considering something like 0300-0800Z, probably with a 2 hour break
10:00-12:00 on Sunday. In the Caribbean, with high-band absorption,
I'd probably be taking breaks more like 1500-1900...
I've never done WAE CW from Maryland. I've never done a DX
contest from the US in August either!
Any thoughts?
Thanks and 73.
Mark, KD4D
------------------------------
From: "Charles W. Shaw" <chas.shaw@verizon.net>
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] If You Don't QSL, LISTEN UP!
Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20030806015545.009f3c90@incoming.verizon.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: list
Message: 7
I have been reading this thread with particular interest trying
to gain
insight regarding the problem I have noticed most in recent years:
W station (or DL or other large ham population type op) goes to
a slightly
difficult (not necessarily rare) entity for a contest or
vacation/DXpedition and before or after the test spends considerable
time
"testing antennas" at contest rates. Then when I try to exchange cards
with him for a needed band/country--the card exchange is outgoing only!
My feeling is: No matter the reason for a station going outside
his home
territory; if he gets on and works pile-up style 599 exchanges by the
hundreds, HE IS OBLIGATED TO RETURN QSL when I provide the envelope and
postage for him.
But it certainly has not been working that way for me lately.
73, Chas. - N5UL
------------------------------
From: "yt3t" <yt3t@absolutok.net>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Re: If You Don't QSL, LISTEN UP!
Message-ID: <000b01c35bde$c9433c80$97e45d50@jstajcic>
References: <200308060056.h760uZgr030420@contesting.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="koi8-r"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Message: 8
http://QSLL.com was invented and created for people who set their
priorities
the way Cedrik does...
It is time and money saving, and works very well...
73
Kele YU1AO
------------------------------
From: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>
To: cq-contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Re: If You Don't QSL, LISTEN UP!
Message-ID: <3F309BF9.6080701@telia.com>
In-Reply-To:
<20030805163124.MISE4876.imf18aec.mail.bellsouth.net@mail.bellsouth.net>
References:
<20030805163124.MISE4876.imf18aec.mail.bellsouth.net@mail.bellsouth.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: list
Message: 9
Agree 100%, pritty hard deal to ignore people in a contest
just becourse they don?t QSL.
Guess it?s the bureau cards that are the problem since it
seems like just about everybody do answer direct cards.
However as AD1C points out, it sure is a lot of work and
do cost some money too.
Forexample, me and a friend just sent about 80 punds of
cards to the bureau, been behind a bit you see, still
behind but only 4 or 5000 cards, however now I have to get
new cards printed and that usually means a bit of a delay.
Sure nice I almost work no contests any more, but that?s
due to other reasons.
73 Jim SM2EKM
------------------------------------------------------------
ku8e@bellsouth.net wrote:
> I think it's pretty childish to purposely ignore someone in a
contest
> just because they didn't return your QSL. Like K9YO pointed out ,
many
> of us have a life outside radio and contesting and find it hard to
spend
> alot of time answering QSL cards. Personally , I am not really
interested
> in QSL cards because I have worked DXCC/WAS etc... many times over
and over.
> But if you send me a card with a SASE , I will be glad to answer it.
Otherwise,
> you are out of luck.
>
------------------------------
From: <jukka.klemola@nokia.com>
To: <kr7x@comcast.net>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] If You Don't QSL, LISTEN UP!
Message-ID:
<ECAA0AE7C430D345934F8DBC108D3F8D0B52A9@saebe007.nmp.nokia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: list
Message: 10
Hi,
I feel I do not have obligation to anything else than
bureau.
Direct QSLling takes much time.
Over 600% more than buro cards.
Normal process is:
Open envelope
Find one IRC, QSL, self addressed envelope
Find QSO details in QSL
Find the QSL for that callsign I used
Find QSO details in log
Write the QSL
Check the envelope it has all information written
Place QSL in envelope
Seal the envelope
Place the IRC in pile
Handle the QSL that came (either to collection or bin)
Handle the trash like the envelope
**the above takes approx 8-10 minutes per QSL as there
are several years old requests
Then:
Drive to post office
See the personnel faces showing "the IRC no-good-person is back.. OH NO
!"
Give the IRCs to the person that looks less unhappy
Person counts the IRCs
The person re-counts the IRCs
I tell how many are to European Union, elsewhere in Europe and outside
Europe
The person gives stamps to the amount of IRCs and continental data
provided
I go elsewhere to place the stamps on the envelopes
I give the envelopes to the personnel
I drive back home
This takes approx 5 minutes per QSL in batches of 100 or so
Time elapsed 13 minutes per QSL or more.
What is wrong with this?
-In 13 minutes I can process 80 buro cards
-I get nothing but pain of wasting my time going
through the steps above
-post office personnel get frustrated when counting
the IRCs
-I loose motivation to direct cards and cannot
do another batch in 6 months
The steps above are the normal procedure,
which I do twice a year.
Some QSLs are unclear
Some QSLs are not claiming QSO with me
Some QSL shipments contain unusual money
-banks take fees for handling foreign currency..!
Some SASEs do not have the country written on
Some guys send QSLs in one or two week intervals in case
they do not get the reply QSL instantly
Of course if there is a clear SASE and QSL is clear
and if there is something, like an extra USD or IRC I feel
less bad taking the heat of going to the post office.
Directs just eat up my time.
I am not at all motivated to do directs.
Buro cards are OK.
73,
Jukka OH6LI
PS. there has been times when one USD does not buy a stamp
to DX in Finland..
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext kr7x@comcast.net [mailto:kr7x@comcast.net]
> Sent: 06 August, 2003 03:59
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] If You Don't QSL, LISTEN UP!
>
>
> Jim and list:
...
>
> I qsl direct SASE's within 2 weeks of receipt. Directs
> without SASE are Q'd via
> the bureau along with the bureau cards, usually every 3
> months. US cards direct
> with SASE see above; all other US cards (direct no SASE and
> via the bureau, yes
> I get many every month) are dead filed. If you are in the US
> and need a IH9P
> card (SSB operations only) send direct with a SASE and you
> will get a card.
>
------------------------------
From: "Ragnar Otterstad" <otterstad@enter.vg>
To: "Al Crespo" <f5vhj@wanadoo.fr>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] QSLing
Message-ID: <MBBBJCHIMOLLDEAHAJGKMEAJFEAA.otterstad@enter.vg>
In-Reply-To:
<!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAjGzMdyWit0WPj1pnSqWzz8KA
AAAQAAAAn/dfwyEnxU2FfFRdsGJd3QEAAAAA@wanadoo.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Message: 11
> I have averaged over 15,000 QSO's a year for the last 20 years. I put
up
> with QSL requests as part of contesting.
> 73, Al, also NH7A, TO5A, TM5A, ex.WR6R , etc.
you have the right attitude, IMHO.'
73
Rag Otterstad LA5HE also JW5HE OZ8RO
located in Telemark - home of skiing.
My antenna "farm" can be found on HTTP://no.photos.yahoo.com/la5he when
you
click on Radio.
Take a look at: http://WWW.visitTelemark.com
or http://www.visitnorway.com
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
End of CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 8, Issue 12
*****************************************
|