CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Fw: [CQ-Contest] Contesters and emergencies

Subject: Fw: [CQ-Contest] Contesters and emergencies
From: k7qq@netzero.net (Rex Maner)
Date: Thu Mar 20 14:27:10 2003
Better yet  why not  QSY to 7100  -  7150  that dead zone that used to be
the Novice band.
Rex  K7qq

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
To: "Larry N7DF" <n7df@zianet.com>; <llindblom@juno.com>
Cc: "Contest Reflector" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 00:25
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesters and emergencies


> Larry, et al:
>
> I wonder what the FCC position would be if the scenario you described
> happened during the CQ WW phone contest and the parties involved
> decided to QSY to 7305 or 14355 KHz? Seems to me that if life and limb
> were involved this might be the best strategy (especially on 40 where it
> would be hard to get the attention of all the stations below 7100 KHz
> listening up into the region 2 phone band).
>
> 73 de Mike, W4EF................................
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Larry N7DF" <n7df@zianet.com>
>
> One thing I wonder about, though.  If this had occurred during a contest
> would it have been possible to get the necessary traffic through the QRM?
> Would people have given us a clear channel or called "CQ contest" on it?
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>     The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
> THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
>        http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>