Subject: | [CQ-Contest] So2R |
---|---|
From: | jskatz@sk.sympatico.ca (Sylvan Katz) |
Date: | Sat Jan 25 19:39:35 2003 |
> May be SO2R needs to be marked in the results if the number of SO2R > participants does not justify creation of the separate category. > On the other hand the results of top 3 packet assisted (if memory serves me > right) are always less then top 3 in the not assisted category. So may be > there is no need to separate these two. Just again mark packet assisted in > the results and that will be enough. Igor, this is a wonderfully sensible idea! In fact, if the summary information for each contest was kept in a proper and publicly accessible database with a few additional fields of information we would have a change of seeing how we did in relationship to others with similar set-ups. In fact, it would allow us to have "contests with in contest" without disturbing the original contest. This is a true 21st century idea. ... Sylvan Sylvan Katz, VE5ZX Saskatoon, SK http://www.dynamicforesight.com/~ve5zx |
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] STUFF, N7MAL |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] STUFF, Leigh S. Jones |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] So2R, Igor Sokolov |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] So2R, Mike Gilmer, N2MG |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |