CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] STUFF

Subject: [CQ-Contest] STUFF
From: ua9cdc@r66.ru (Igor Sokolov)
Date: Sun Jan 26 01:05:44 2003
>
> On 25 Jan 2003 K?HB wrote:
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "James Neiger" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
> >
> >
> > > I marvel at those skilled in SO2R.  Maybe I'll be proficient by the
time I'm
> > > 70 (soon).  Or not.  Meanwhile, please, let's leave these fellows
alone;
> > > perhaps we can shut our mouths, open our minds, and learn.   Special
> > > category? Nah.  Special operators?  You bet they are.........
> > >
> > > Second topic.  Let's do away with ASSISTED.   Packet is here to stay.
So
> > > many are using it today, and claiming un-assisted, why should they
have this
> > > 'special advantage'?  Let everyone use it, without penalty.
> >
> > I agree.  Let's do away with ASSISTED.  If you use packet you go into
the
> > "multi-op" category.  Packet isn't a skill like SO2R, it's a crutch like
> > super-check-partial.
> >
> > 73, de Hans, K0HB
> > RadioSport Minnesota -- http://www.W0AA.org
> >
> So anyone who uses supercheck partial should be a multiop, too?
> --
> Barry Kutner, W2UP              Internet: w2up@mindspring.com
> Newtown, PA                     Frankford Radio Club

And computer logging and sending...

73, Igor UA9CDC

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>