Subject: | [CQ-Contest] Again? |
---|---|
From: | n2mg@eham.net (Mike Gilmer, N2MG) |
Date: | Fri Jan 24 19:24:01 2003 |
I don't believe the octopus had anything to do with single-op. It had to do with multi-singles... There is STILL no rule against multiple tx in a single-op. Mike N2MG K3MM wrote: > Actually, I believe when this first occurred decades ago, there was no > rule against multiple transmitters in single op. The word "octopus" comes > to mind from long ago... > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Single op technology aided., K4BEV@aol.com |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Advantages..., Chris Hurlbut |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Again?, tgstewart@pepco.com |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Re: [RTTY] Ahh yess.... the old SO2R debate!, Jerry Flanders |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |