One of those who finished in the top ten in CW section was dipoles plus
an inverted L for 40/80/160, not even a tribander. Shouldn't
demonstrated abuse be at the root of a discussion like this? What abuse?
This whole thread has been like the medieval arguments over how many
angels could fit on the head of a pin.
- - . . . . . . - - . . . . - - . . - . .
73, Guy
k2av@contesting.com
Apex, NC, USA
----- Original Message -----
From: Jon Ogden <jono@enteract.com>
To: <k6ll@juno.com>; <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2000 8:11 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX & "whats a tribander?"
>
> on 5/7/00 11:11 AM, k6ll@juno.com at k6ll@juno.com wrote:
>
> >> My suggestion is to take a look at the past results. What are the
> >> WINNERS
> >> using?
> >
> > In 1999, both modes, and 2000 ssb, the high scorer used a
> > KT-34XA at 49' and never operated on 40, 80, or 160.
>
> Agreed. I don't know of any who landed in the top 5 who "cheated."
Take a
> look at the scores and station descriptions. Look up the web pages of
the
> top finishers.
>
> 73,
>
> Jon
> NA9D (ex: KE9NA)
>
> -------------------------------------
> Jon Ogden
> NA9D
>
> Member: ARRL, AMSAT, DXCC, NRA
>
> http://www.qsl.net/ke9na
>
> "A life lived in fear is a life half lived."
>
>
> --
> CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
> Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
>
>
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
|