Subject: | [CQ-Contest] IC756PRO vs International Radio filters |
---|---|
From: | k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV) |
Date: | Thu Mar 9 20:17:58 2000 |
The DSP is too late in the sequence to deal with 30 or 40 over signals up or down 300-400 hz (standard ugly situation in the 160 CW tests as example of a really bad case). It needs to be significantly clipped WAY up front in the RX. My take is listen to what the INRAD 8mhz 250 *AND* the INRAD 455 250 *AND* the 250 DSP sounds like. That might finally make the skirts steep enough to hear the DX. --. .-.. 73, Guy Guy Olinger, K2AV k2av@contesting.com Apex, NC, USA -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] SOC Explanation, Clive Whelan |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Were some Switzerland HB9 stations change to HB2 during the ARRL DXContest??, Dave Rich |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] IC756PRO vs International Radio filters, k6ll@juno.com |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] IC756PRO vs International Radio filters, 00tlzivney@bsuvc.bsu.edu |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |