KØHB writes:
> Kenneth E. Harker wrote:
>
> > Participation and interest in the sprints is at an all-time low,
> > and without heavy-duty sponsorship, the contests are destined to
> > die out.
>
> Contests succeed because they are fun, not because of their
> 'sponsorship'. If quality of 'sponsorship' determined longevity,
> then most of the CQ-sponsored events would have been stillborn.
>
I would consider CQ to be heavy-duty sponsorship.
--
George Fremin III
Johnson City, Texas "Experiment trumps theory."
K5TR (ex.WB5VZL) -- Dave Leeson W6NL
geoiii@kkn.net
830-868-2510
http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
|