East Coast Bob wrote:
> About all this is going to do is cause the casual CW contester to stop
> entering. No one for whatever reason wants to be the guy to have any
> changes made to his log.
Actually, I feel exactly the opposite! In most contests (with the
exception
of November Sweepstakes) I consider myself a casual operator, but take
some
pride in trying to turn in the mythical golden error free log. (Notice
I said
"trying"!)
I enthusiastically welcome this new effort to determine who the *really*
good operators are.
> What I submit is my best shot at what I copied.
Same with me, and if my "best shot" is more accurate than your "best
shot",
then I want to win.
If my log is full of busted exchanges, then I want to know that too, so
I
can beat you next year.
73, de Hans, K0HB
~~~
Observation the morning after the contest:
"A logging computer lets you make more mistakes faster than
any invention in human history -- with the possible
exceptions of a quart of tequila and a borrowed Vibroplex
key." K0HB
~~~
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
|