sniped
> Well, here it is, verbatim off of the KT0R SS report .............
> "The callsigns listed after the dupe check are the ones that didn't
> make it into the database. The criteria for a call to show up in the >
> database is that it must show up in at least 4 of the submitted
> electronic logs. Callsigns that have been judged to be incorrect will > show
> up here-along with the correct callsign. Incorrect calls are > removed from
> your score, along with a penalty of 3 additional QSOs."
>
> Here were two examples, both locals, from the KT0R SS report:
>
> "W0DJC was not found in the SS database. Received QSO#=1. Calls with
> same check/section: K0KX W0ZQ WA2MNO WE0Q W0GQ"
> "KB0VCV was not found in the SS database. Received QSO#=1"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This line of reasoning stinks! It is highly probable that a station
could make 10 or more QSOs just with guys looking for States, who
never
submit a log. Where is it written you have to work 4 "topguns"?
Regarding the rediculous penalty of an additional 3 Qs, just what
happens when that "unique" also just happens to be the only station
you work in a new section?
And using one of the examples, it's pretty damned hard to miscopy
W0DJC with any of the others.
73
Ed ex K4DJC
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
|